EAG scientists are experts in surface analysis, including the various factors that affect surface chemistry and other surface-specific properties. When surface information is needed, we determine the most relevant analytical approach to obtain the best results. Our laboratories employ different surface analysis and surface characterization techniques to investigate and understand the issues associated with surface coverage, molecular orientation, functionalization, contamination, and surface segregation.
The chemistry of the upper monolayer of a surface can have a dramatic effect on surface wetting, biocompatibility, reactivity, and adhesion. For example, plasma processing and other gas-phase treatments are routinely used to alter the near-surface chemistry of polymer films prior to printing or adhesion steps. Similarly, organic silanes and thiol-terminated self-assembled monolayers can be applied from solution to modify the surface chemistry of glasses and metals.
EAG’s materials surface analysis laboratory solves issues with adhesion and bonding, questions regarding surface cleanliness and investigations regarding morphology and topography of materials’ surfaces.
Adhesion involves joining two or more surfaces together. Surface analysis investigations may focus on problems with both adhesion and bonding. Failures can occur when contaminants are introduced into the process, or if the adhesive components are formulated incorrectly. Many different failure modes and causes of failures can exist for different materials systems.
Uncovering the source of adhesion and bonding problems in surface analysis lab investigations can require the use of very surface-sensitive analytical tools. If possible, the failure site should be investigated by examining both sides of the delaminated interface.
Assessing surface cleanliness can involve a range of different measurement approaches, depending on the surface and material of interest. It may also involve comparing samples that were processed differently or exposed to different environments. Differences between the test sample and the control or reference sample are often best highlighted by this approach. For example a very sensitive measurement may reveal that cleaning chemicals left residues behind because they were not rinsed off properly. A less sensitive measurement technique may not have detected the residue, or may not have had sufficient signal to fully identify it.
Assessing cleanliness generally requires some understanding of the possible sources of the contaminants:
Investigating very clean surfaces may require techniques that have detection limits in the parts-per-million range, such as Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence (TXRF), which detects elemental species only, or Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (TOF-SIMS), which looks at both elemental and molecular species. In cases where cleanliness is measured by the number of particles on the surface, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) may be a good option, for both surface imaging and particle counting.
Morphology is the qualitative evaluation of the three-dimensional shape of a surface, whereas topography provides quantitative feature dimensions. The choice of surface characterization analytical technique depends on whether qualitative and/or quantitative information is required.
Morphology, or “what a sample looks like,” is best evaluated using imaging techniques, such as optical microscopy or Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). These methods can also provide layer thickness and other quantitative information.
Contact us today for your Surface Analysis needs. Please complete the form below to have an EAG expert contact you.
To enable certain features and improve your experience with us, this site stores cookies on your computer. Please click Continue to provide your authorization and permanently remove this message.